|
The Library
How our timing works.
We have reason to believe Niven's and Ian's line is mutating at a
rate of once every 250 years. Stan and I are reasonably sure our line is
mutating at a rate of once every 300 years. This means once ever 24
generations. Not once over 250-500 generations (6,250-12,500 years!!) as many DNA researchers seem to
think.
How far back is enough?
Our lineages in the project so far are clearly mutating among themselves,
but only among those markers known to mutate quickly. With but one exception,
they're all very tight in the markers that have mutated less over time. This is
significant in that it tells us our slower markers are not that different. Even
among those project members not yet in a lineage the markers are not that far
off. I'm looking at a genetic distance of zero here to be extra strict. Perhaps
a further examination of allowing distance here would prove useful.
250 yrs per mutation
x 1 genetic
distance (GD)
250 yrs ago
1756 AD |
 |
By this point, our modern Sinclairs and St. Clairs have entered
North America and anywhere colonized by Great Britain |
250 yrs per mutation
x 2
GD
750 yrs ago
1556 AD |
 |
Sinclairs DNA is still in Western Europe, Scandinavia, Germany,
France, Russia, the Middle East and Africa. Our trail of genetic
information has grown quite long. It may even be in North America as
some of Prince Henry's DNA may have remained with the Mi'kmac Indians. |
250 yrs per mutation
x 3 genetic
distance (GD)
750 yrs ago
1256 AD |
 |
Our DNA is now showing up in England and Scotland. Of course, it's
still in all the other places we lived. Not every Sinclair family member
packed up and left for England and Scotland. |
250 yrs per mutation
x 4 genetic
distance (GD)
1000 yrs ago
1006 AD |
 |
Sinclair DNA from Norway enters northwestern France. But it's not
necessarily the first time that DNA has been here. It's very possible
that our R1b DNA was here from those in Africa who came this way rather
than go through Russia. |
250 yrs per mutation
x 5 GD
1500 yrs ago
506 AD |
 |
Sinclair DNA from Norway enters northwestern France. But it's not
necessarily the first time that DNA has been here. It's very possible
that our R1b DNA was here from those in Africa who came this way rather
than go through Russia. |
250 yrs
x 7 GD
1750 yrs ago
256 AD |
 |
Just after the time of the birth of Jesus, our DNA was already in
Europe, the middle east, the steppes of Russia and, of course, our trail
of DNA is still back to Africa. |
| |
 |
Sometime after the last ice age, our line started moving north and
west. The ice had retreated, the land was fertile and we moved
northward. Our signature of the Q haplogroup and R1b makes it almost
certain we have Viking blood. |
18,000 yrs ago
/ 250 years per mutation
72 Genetic Distance |
 |
Let's jump back in time now to the last ice age, about 18,000 years
ago. In fact, our genetic footprint was already in Europe, the middle
east and Russia. We were staying south of the ice, but still proved
incredibly adept at reproducing our line as our R1b haplogroup proves.
So when I ask, how far back is far enough, the genetic distance of 72
proves that each of our project members could well have been related, if
you look only at genetic distance. Is connecting to the family 18,000
years ago enough? |
| 200,000 years ago |
 |
Mankind's origins were in Africa
and, of course, our line with them. |
Click here to get back to "Our
Y-DNA"
© Copyright St. Clair Research 2005, All Rights Reserved
Steve's free web templates
|